United States | Spending and voting

Will Democrats be rewarded for spending lots of money?

The precedents suggest not

|WASHINGTON, DC

AMERICA’S PROGRESSIVES reckon they would win more elections if only Congress would pass their left-leaning economic agenda. The presidential campaigns of Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren in 2020 were animated by the idea that raising taxes on the wealthiest Americans to pay for much more spending would turn out younger and less engaged voters. A watered-down version of the same theory is being applied by some Democrats to Joe Biden’s bipartisan infrastructure bill, which allocates $550bn in new spending over the next ten years for various public-works projects and was signed into law this week. The total price-tag of $1trn is higher than the Democrats’ most recent infrastructure-focused stimulus package, Barack Obama’s 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). Will voters be madly grateful?

This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline “Spending and voting”

The triumph of big government

From the November 20th 2021 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from United States

President Donald Trump talks to reporters after signing executive orders in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington.

A controversial idea to hand even more power to the president

Impoundment is about to come a step closer

William McKinley.

Checks and Balance newsletter: Trump revives McKinley’s imperial legacy


Incoming "border czar" and former acting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement director Tom Homan speaks during a visit to Camp Eagle, Eagle Pass, Texas, USA.

Tom Homan, unleashed

America’s new border czar spent decades waiting for a president like Donald Trump


An unfinished election may shape a swing state’s future

A Supreme Court race ended very close. Then the lawyers arrived.

Donald Trump cries “invasion” to justify an immigration crackdown

His executive orders range from benign to belligerent

To end birthright citizenship, Donald Trump misreads the constitution

A change would also create huge practical problems