The era of multilateral peacekeeping draws to an unhappy close
The order replacing it in Africa is likely to be worse
The new year was supposed to herald a bright new era of multilateral co-operation. A slimmed-down peacekeeping force convened by the African Union (AU) but paid for primarily by the UN was to begin battling against jihadists in Somalia on January 1st, replacing a mission reluctantly funded by the European Union. The arrangement was meant to pave the way for similar operations elsewhere, with the African troops fighting local insurgencies henceforth guaranteed reliable international funding. The UN Security Council endorsed the new Somalia mission on December 27th. But it is unlikely to live up to its lofty aims. As 2024 drew to a close, diplomats had yet to establish who would pay for it or which countries would contribute peacekeeping troops.
This article appeared in the Middle East & Africa section of the print edition under the headline “Out with a whimper”
More from Middle East & Africa
The fate of minorities in post-Assad Syria
The country’s new rulers have yet to include other groups in their government
Eastern Congo is as wretched as ever
Peace talks have collapsed yet again, as rebel groups continue to make mayhem
Syria’s new rulers have inherited an economic disaster
A legacy of mismanagement and lingering sanctions will make it hard to rebuild the country
South Sudan’s economic crisis threatens its fragile peace
It shows what happens when a petrostate’s lifeline disappears overnight
Israel and Hamas look close to some kind of deal
Lebanon, Syria and Donald Trump have all been important
Ethiopia and Somalia claim to have settled a dangerous feud
But there are reasons to be sceptical