South Africa’s diplomatic descent
Cosying up to Russia and China harms South Africa, and the world
Last August, as Russian missiles were pounding cities in Ukraine, South Africa’s foreign minister, Naledi Pandor, delivered a key foreign-policy speech. For a country that was once a symbol of universal rights, this might have been the ideal time to speak out against Russia’s slaughter of civilians. Instead, Ms Pandor unveiled a new policy, making national interest the lodestone of South Africa’s foreign policy. This overtly overturned its former principle that human rights should guide international relations. As if to emphasise this shift, she lashed out at some of South Africa’s closest friends, accusing America of bullying African countries, the EU of being underhand in its trade relations, and the West in general of being duplicitous when talking about its shared values with poor countries.
Explore more
This article appeared in the Leaders section of the print edition under the headline “Irrational interest”
Leaders February 25th 2023
- How to win the hot war in Ukraine and the cold war that will follow it
- A year after he promised a transformation, Olaf Scholz has done too little
- Joe Biden’s new border policies irritate the extremes. Good
- South Africa’s diplomatic descent
- China has not resolved its past lending mistakes. But it is learning from them
More from Leaders
Health warnings about alcohol give only half the story
Enjoyment matters as well as risk
Pete Hegseth’s culture war will weaken America’s armed forces
Donald Trump’s nominee for defence risks driving away talent
The capitalist revolution Africa needs
The world’s poorest continent should embrace its least fashionable idea
Just because Indonesia has nickel, doesn’t mean it should make EVs
Economic nationalists are making a reckless bet
Donald the Deporter
Could a man who makes ugly promises of mass expulsion actually fix America’s immigration system?
Mark Zuckerberg’s U-turn on fact-checking is craven—but correct
Social-media platforms should not be in the business of defining truth