Leaders | Meta’s makeover

Mark Zuckerberg’s U-turn on fact-checking is craven—but correct

Social-media platforms should not be in the business of defining truth

Photograph: Getty Images/The Economist

Apart from the million-dollar wristwatch, it had the look of a hostage video. On January 7th Mark Zuckerberg posted a clip to Facebook and Instagram in which he announced changes to his social networks’ content-moderation policies in response to what he called the “cultural tipping point” of Donald Trump’s election. There have been “too many mistakes and too much censorship”, he said, adding that Mr Trump’s return provides an “opportunity to restore free expression”. He also appointed Dana White, an ally of Mr Trump’s, to Meta’s board (as well as John Elkann, the boss of Exor, which part-owns The Economist’s parent company).

More from Leaders

Upside down warning signs with an exclamation mark in the shape of martini glasses

Health warnings about alcohol give only half the story

Enjoyment matters as well as risk

Marine recruits take part in a simualted combat situation in Parris Island, South Carolina

Pete Hegseth’s culture war will weaken America’s armed forces

Donald Trump’s nominee for defence risks driving away talent


The capitalist revolution Africa needs

The world’s poorest continent should embrace its least fashionable idea


Just because Indonesia has nickel, doesn’t mean it should make EVs

Economic nationalists are making a reckless bet

Donald the Deporter

Could a man who makes ugly promises of mass expulsion actually fix America’s immigration system?

The Putinisation of central Europe

Austria could soon get its most extreme chancellor since the 1940s