Leaders | Promises and power grabs

Fiddling with constitutions is usually a risky distraction

Most of the time they should be left alone

A man walks into a library and asks for a copy of the French constitution. “I’m sorry,” replies the librarian. “We don’t stock periodicals.” By one count, France has had 16 constitutions since its first in 1791. Its current version, which dates from 1958, has been amended dozens of times. But it is a beacon of stability compared with many other places. On September 4th Chileans will vote on a new charter. If it is approved, which it should not be, it would replace a document that has been amended 60 times since 1980. The rest of Latin America is equally keen on change. One calculation in 2009 put the average lifespan of a Latin American constitution at 16.5 years, compared with 77 in western Europe. A string of changes in the intervening years will have done little to close that discrepancy.

This article appeared in the Leaders section of the print edition under the headline “A risky distraction”

Are sanctions working?

From the August 27th 2022 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Leaders

Upside down warning signs with an exclamation mark in the shape of martini glasses

Health warnings about alcohol give only half the story

Enjoyment matters as well as risk

Marine recruits take part in a simualted combat situation in Parris Island, South Carolina

Pete Hegseth’s culture war will weaken America’s armed forces

Donald Trump’s nominee for defence risks driving away talent


The capitalist revolution Africa needs

The world’s poorest continent should embrace its least fashionable idea


Just because Indonesia has nickel, doesn’t mean it should make EVs

Economic nationalists are making a reckless bet

Donald the Deporter

Could a man who makes ugly promises of mass expulsion actually fix America’s immigration system?

Mark Zuckerberg’s U-turn on fact-checking is craven—but correct

Social-media platforms should not be in the business of defining truth