Fiddling with constitutions is usually a risky distraction
Most of the time they should be left alone
A man walks into a library and asks for a copy of the French constitution. “I’m sorry,” replies the librarian. “We don’t stock periodicals.” By one count, France has had 16 constitutions since its first in 1791. Its current version, which dates from 1958, has been amended dozens of times. But it is a beacon of stability compared with many other places. On September 4th Chileans will vote on a new charter. If it is approved, which it should not be, it would replace a document that has been amended 60 times since 1980. The rest of Latin America is equally keen on change. One calculation in 2009 put the average lifespan of a Latin American constitution at 16.5 years, compared with 77 in western Europe. A string of changes in the intervening years will have done little to close that discrepancy.
This article appeared in the Leaders section of the print edition under the headline “A risky distraction”
More from Leaders
Health warnings about alcohol give only half the story
Enjoyment matters as well as risk
Pete Hegseth’s culture war will weaken America’s armed forces
Donald Trump’s nominee for defence risks driving away talent
The capitalist revolution Africa needs
The world’s poorest continent should embrace its least fashionable idea
Just because Indonesia has nickel, doesn’t mean it should make EVs
Economic nationalists are making a reckless bet
Donald the Deporter
Could a man who makes ugly promises of mass expulsion actually fix America’s immigration system?
Mark Zuckerberg’s U-turn on fact-checking is craven—but correct
Social-media platforms should not be in the business of defining truth