Leaders | Business and government

Welcome to the era of the bossy state

Countries around the world want to bend companies to their will

THE RELATIONSHIP between governments and businesses is always changing. After 1945, many countries sought to rebuild society using firms that were state-owned and -managed. By the 1980s, faced with sclerosis in the West, the state retreated to become an umpire overseeing the rules for private firms to compete in a global market—a lesson learned, in a fashion, by the communist bloc. Now a new and turbulent phase is under way, as citizens demand action on problems, from social justice to the climate. In response, governments are directing firms to make society safer and fairer, but without controlling their shares or their boards. Instead of being the owner or umpire, the state has become the backseat driver. This bossy business interventionism is well-intentioned. But, ultimately, it is a mistake.

This article appeared in the Leaders section of the print edition under the headline “Beware the bossy state”

Beware the bossy state

From the January 15th 2022 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Leaders

Upside down warning signs with an exclamation mark in the shape of martini glasses

Health warnings about alcohol give only half the story

Enjoyment matters as well as risk

Marine recruits take part in a simualted combat situation in Parris Island, South Carolina

Pete Hegseth’s culture war will weaken America’s armed forces

Donald Trump’s nominee for defence risks driving away talent


The capitalist revolution Africa needs

The world’s poorest continent should embrace its least fashionable idea


Just because Indonesia has nickel doesn’t mean it should make EVs

Economic nationalists are making a reckless bet

Donald the Deporter

Could a man who makes ugly promises of mass expulsion actually fix America’s immigration system?

Mark Zuckerberg’s U-turn on fact-checking is craven—but correct

Social-media platforms should not be in the business of defining truth