The case against Google hinges on an antitrust “mistake”
Trustbusters are seeking to break up the tech giant, undoing a 15-year-old merger
IN 1912 America’s Supreme Court ruled that a coalition of 14 railroad proprietors had used their joint ownership of a bridge across the Mississippi river, near the St Louis terminal, to unlawfully stifle competition. The crossing gave the railroad trust a chokehold over traffic to and from the city’s main terminal. St Louis was an important railway hub. In the court’s opinion, the monopoly power over the railway bridge was therefore a means to foreclose the business of rival rail operators across America.
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “In search of a problem”
Finance & economics March 4th 2023
- America’s property market suggests recession is on the way
- Russia’s sanctions-dodging is getting ever more sophisticated
- The anti-ESG industry is taking investors for a ride
- China’s cities are on the verge of a debt crisis
- Is India’s boom helping the poor?
- David Solomon lacks answers for Goldman Sachs’s angry investors
- Ajay Banga may be just what the fractious World Bank requires
- The case against Google hinges on an antitrust “mistake”
More from Finance & economics
Europe could be torn apart by new divisions
The continent is at its most vulnerable in decades
How corporate bonds fell out of fashion
The market is at its hottest in years—and a shadow of its former self
An American purchase of Greenland could be the deal of the century
The economics of buying new territory
China’s markets take a fresh beating
Authorities have responded by bossing around investors
Can America’s economy cope with mass deportations?
Production slowdowns, more imports and pricier housing could follow
Would an artificial-intelligence bubble be so bad?
A new book by Byrne Hobart and Tobias Huber argues there are advantages to financial mania