The case for strong and silent central banks
The second in our series on the central-bank pivot
Late on june 13th, a curious article appeared in the Wall Street Journal. It said that the Federal Reserve was “likely to consider” raising interest rates by 0.75 percentage points at its meeting on June 15th. The article was unusually silent about its sources. And it proved uncannily prescient. Two days later the Fed did indeed raise interest rates by that amount, its biggest increase in 28 years. Many investors believe the central bank had used the press to warn financial markets about what it would do in advance (albeit not very far in advance). That would make the Journal story an unconventional example of “forward guidance”.
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “Forward misguidance”
Finance & economics July 2nd 2022
- The battle between Asia’s financial centres is heating up
- Can Europe keep the lights on this winter?
- Why inflation looks likely to stay above the pre-pandemic norm
- Inflation in America soars to 8%. Or is it more like 6%?
- The latest desperate attempt to prop up the Turkish lira
- The allure of betting on mergers
- What past market crashes have looked like
- The case for strong and silent central banks
More from Finance & economics
Will America’s crypto frenzy end in disaster?
Donald Trump’s team is about to bring digital finance into the mainstream
Do tariffs raise inflation?
Usually. But the bigger problem is that they harm economic growth and innovation
European governments struggle to stop rich people from fleeing
Exit taxes are popular, and counter-productive
Saba Capital wages war on underperforming British investment trusts
How many will end up in Boaz Weinstein’s sights?
Has Japan truly escaped low inflation?
Its central bankers are increasingly hopeful
How American bankers dodged the MAGA carnage
The masters of the universe have escaped an anti-globalist revolt