Is there more or less sex on screen?
Data show that the amount of sexual content in top films has sharply declined since 2000
FIFTY YEARS ago the Supreme Court dabbled in film criticism. A cinema manager in Georgia had been prosecuted for “distributing obscene material” in the form of “Carnal Knowledge” (1971), a film about two men’s sexual pathologies starring Jack Nicholson and Art Garfunkel. It was rated R, denoting adult content, but it was hardly explicit. In one scene you can hear moans of pleasure, but all you see is an empty living room. The court ruled that the film was not obscene.
This article appeared in the Culture section of the print edition under the headline “Frisky business”
Culture May 4th 2024
- Romantasy brings dragons and eroticism together. At last
- Is there more or less sex on screen?
- Fed up with Biden v Trump II? Some succour from fictional rematches
- A new graphic novel takes aim at Iran’s oppressive government
- “Boléro” is among the most lucrative works of classical music
- A little-remembered rivalry that shaped the modern world
More from Culture
Want to spend time with a different American president?
Five presidential biographies to distract you from the news
Los Angeles has lost some of its trailblazing architecture
How will it rebuild?
What firms are for
The framework for thinking about business and capitalism is hopelessly outdated, argues a new book
Greg Gutfeld, America’s most popular late-night host, rules the airwaves
The left gave him his perch
Astrology is booming, thanks to technology and younger enthusiasts
Gen Z is full of stargazing users
Why matcha, made from green tea, is the drink of the moment
Is it really a healthy alternative to coffee? Not the way Gen Z orders it