Culture | Frisky business

Is there more or less sex on screen?

Data show that the amount of sexual content in top films has sharply declined since 2000

Photograph: Courtesy of Netflix

FIFTY YEARS ago the Supreme Court dabbled in film criticism. A cinema manager in Georgia had been prosecuted for “distributing obscene material” in the form of “Carnal Knowledge” (1971), a film about two men’s sexual pathologies starring Jack Nicholson and Art Garfunkel. It was rated R, denoting adult content, but it was hardly explicit. In one scene you can hear moans of pleasure, but all you see is an empty living room. The court ruled that the film was not obscene.

This article appeared in the Culture section of the print edition under the headline “Frisky business”

From the May 4th 2024 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Culture

An illustration of a stack of books that make up the American flag.

Want to spend time with a different American president?

Five presidential biographies to distract you from the news

Eames House, Chautauqua Drive, Pacific Palisades, California

Los Angeles has lost some of its trailblazing architecture

How will it rebuild?


A worker takes down a sign saying "shareholders", immediately after the UBS General Assembly which followed the emergency takeover of Credit Suisse

What firms are for

The framework for thinking about business and capitalism is hopelessly outdated, argues a new book


Greg Gutfeld, America’s most popular late-night host, rules the airwaves

The left gave him his perch

Why matcha, made from green tea, is the drink of the moment

Is it really a healthy alternative to coffee? Not the way Gen Z orders it