Even with political gridlock, America Inc should still fear the bossy state
Beware the power of one-party state governments
In 1922 Vladimir Lenin, criticised by Communist militants for tolerating a minuscule role for the private sector in Bolshevik Russia, insisted that it was a reasonable trade-off because the state would still control “the commanding heights” of the economy. For much of the rest of the 20th century that phrase came to stand for state meddling—not a complete clampdown on private markets, but preference for a dominant economic role played by the mandarins of the public sector.
This article appeared in the Business section of the print edition under the headline “Command and control”
Business November 12th 2022
- A sleuth’s guide to the coming wave of corporate fraud
- A series of shortages threatens EU supply chains
- As tech lay-offs spread, Meta sacks 11,000 workers
- The sportswear giants are running into hurdles
- Can American liquefied natural gas rescue Europe?
- The UN takes on corporate greenwashing
- Elon Musk’s challenge to management thinking
- Even with political gridlock, America Inc should still fear the bossy state
More from Business
Germans are world champions of calling in sick
It’s easy and it pays well
Knowing what your colleagues earn
The pros and cons of greater pay transparency
A $500bn investment plan says a lot about Trump’s AI priorities
It’s build, baby, build
Donald Trump’s America will not become a tech oligarchy
Reasons not to panic about the tech-industrial complex
OpenAI’s latest model will change the economics of software
The more reasoning it does, the more computer power it uses
Donald Trump once tried to ban TikTok. Now can he save it?
To keep the app alive in America, he must persuade China to sell up