The rise of the borderless trustbuster
Corporate dealmakers face a formidable foe. It isn’t Lina Khan
It was to be the biggest industrial merger ever. In late 2000 General Electric (ge), the world’s most valuable company at the time, agreed to pay $43bn for Honeywell, a smaller American manufacturer of, among other things, aircraft electronics. Jack Welch, ge’s ceo and America Inc’s capitalist-in-chief, put off his retirement to see it through. The transaction, codenamed “Project Storm”, seemed a done deal. American authorities gave their blessing, finding no threat to competition (ge made jet engines but not avionics). Regulators elsewhere were expected to defer to America in a merger involving two American firms. So it came as a shock when, in 2001, the European Commission killed it. A diversified ge would, the eu’s competition watchdog argued, wield too much power in the market for aircraft parts. America’s trustbusters pooh-poohed the commission’s theory of “conglomerate effects”. The treasury secretary, Paul O’Neill, called the ruling “off the wall”.
This article appeared in the Business section of the print edition under the headline “The borderless trustbuster”
More from Business
What Elon Musk should learn from Larry Ellison
The founder of Oracle has demonstrated remarkable staying power
Football clubs are making more money than ever. Players not so much
For both teams and their top stars, it helps to have a brand
The allure of the company town
Lego, Corning and the survival of an old idea
From cribs to carriers, high-end baby products are in vogue
Demographic and technological changes are making infancy more expensive
No one gains from American tariffs on cars from Mexico and Canada
Donald Trump’s levy will hit his country’s carmakers hardest
DeepSeek poses a challenge to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley
The story of Liang Wenfeng, the model-maker’s mysterious founder