Briefing | Motion to dismiss

The filibuster is an oddity that harms American democracy

And it does not even stem from the constitution

IN THE AFTERMATH of a mass shooting at a primary school in Newtown, Connecticut, in 2012, two senators introduced a modest measure to require background checks on all gun sales. Out of 100 senators, 54 voted to move ahead with it. In almost every parliament in the world, such a majority would be enough to ensure passage. In the Senate it meant defeat.

This article appeared in the Briefing section of the print edition under the headline “Motion to dismiss”

Biden’s big gamble: What a $1.9 trillion stimulus means for the world economy

From the March 13th 2021 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Briefing

A lawyer who specialises in shipping and maritime law.

Even in India, bureaucracy is being curtailed

Many small steps could make a big difference

An illustration shows a carpenter, a surgeon and a business person—representing the infrastructure, health-care and finance sectors—cutting through red tape.

Many governments talk about cutting regulation but few manage to

Yet radical deregulation is often a big boost to growth


Why Chinese AI has stunned the world

DeepSeek’s models are much cheaper and almost as good as American rivals


The right in Congress and the courts will reshape Donald Trump’s agenda

As dominant as the new president is, there is still life in Washington’s institutions

How far will Donald Trump go to get rid of illegal immigrants?

It is his signature policy, but the obstacles are daunting

Young customers in developing countries propel a boom in plastic surgery

Falling costs and converging beauty standards spur new habits