The Supreme Court declines to upend American election law
A fringe theory gets a chilly reception from the justices
IN THE RUN-UP to the 2020 presidential election—and in its fraught denouement—supporters of Donald Trump turned to a novel theory to boost their candidate’s chances of staying in the White House. Citing the “independent state legislature” theory, they sought to block state-court rulings in Pennsylvania and elsewhere that made voting easier during the covid-19 pandemic by, for instance, extending deadlines for mail-in ballots. And after election day, legal advisers drew on the notion in cooking up a radical scheme to replace electors in states won by Joe Biden with “alternative” slates for Mr Trump.
This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline “A victory for democracy”
United States July 1st 2023
- America aims for nuclear-power renaissance
- Massachusetts is not the gun-control beacon it once was
- What the rise of student consulting clubs means
- In North Carolina a jilted husband can sue his wife’s lover
- The Supreme Court declines to upend American election law
- Why many American states and cities are changing their flags
- AI is making Washington smarter
From the July 1st 2023 edition
Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents
Explore the editionMore from United States
The White House has been fluid on gender for a decade
Trump’s order “restoring biological truth” will not be the last word
A controversial idea to hand even more power to the president
Impoundment is about to come a step closer
Tom Homan, unleashed
America’s new border czar spent decades waiting for a president like Donald Trump
An unfinished election may shape a swing state’s future
A Supreme Court race ended very close. Then the lawyers arrived.
Donald Trump cries “invasion” to justify an immigration crackdown
His executive orders range from benign to belligerent