United States | Later, Tucker

Fox News shows that not even Tucker Carlson is bigger than the network

Its most popular anchor was always an unlikely populist

WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 29: Fox News host Tucker Carlson discusses 'Populism and the Right' during the National Review Institute's Ideas Summit at the Mandarin Oriental Hotel March 29, 2019 in Washington, DC. Carlson talked about a large variety of topics including dropping testosterone levels, increasing rates of suicide, unemployment, drug addiction and social hierarchy at the summit, which had the theme 'The Case for the American Experiment.'  (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Gone, but not for longImage: Getty Images
|NEW YORK

Six years ago the most popular cable-television host had a prime-time show on Fox News. Liberals abhorred him; conservatives tuned in to see him rail against “political correctness” and other liberal pieties. But after the New York Times reported that Fox had paid out $13m to settle lawsuits from five women accusing him of sexual harassment or inappropriate behaviour, and more than 50 advertisers abandoned his show, the network unceremoniously kicked Bill O’Reilly to the kerb (Mr O’Reilly has long denied the charges).

This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline “Later, Tucker”

From the April 29th 2023 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from United States

Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo speaks at a convention in San Fransico

America’s bet on industrial policy starts to pay off for semiconductors

Trump will not reverse the chip subsidies, but will he reinforce them?

A red siren with a beer bottle in the centre

Most Americans think moderate drinking is fine

They are unaware of the cancer risk


Speaker of the US House of Representatives Mike Johnson

Mike Johnson has his old job back, for now

But the GOP has the tightest House majority in nearly a century


When treating snakebites, American hospitals turn to zoos 

The zookeeper will see you now

Los Angeles against the flames

Always vulnerable, the city is increasingly susceptible to fire

The US Army needs less good, cheaper drones to compete

It seems obvious. So what is stopping it from happening?