United States | Full-court press

Why winning a Wisconsin Supreme Court race matters so much 

In a gridlocked, gerrymandered state, it is the Democrats’ best hope for change

Wisconsin Supreme Court candidates Republican-backed Dan Kelly and Democratic-supported Janet Protasiewicz participate in a debate Tuesday, March 21, 2023, in Madison, Wis. (AP Photo/Morry Gash)
The politics are not blurredImage: AP
|MADISON

ELECTING JUDGES is fundamentally odd. The perfect example of this is the race to fill an open seat for the Wisconsin Supreme Court. The two candidates met for the only debate of the campaign on March 21st. Daniel Kelly, the relative conservative, insisted in his closing remarks that he was completely apolitical. “We must not talk about politics,” he said. The moderator, a political journalist who had asked mostly political questions, thanked the debate’s sponsor, a website called WisPolitics.com. Journalists then flocked to Mr Kelly’s press adviser, a Republican Party activist and former candidate for lieutenant-governor, to try to get interviews.

This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline “Full-court press”

From the April 1st 2023 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from United States

Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo speaks at a convention in San Fransico

America’s bet on industrial policy starts to pay off for semiconductors

Trump will not reverse the chip subsidies, but will he reinforce them?

A red siren with a beer bottle in the centre

Most Americans think moderate drinking is fine

They are unaware of the cancer risk


Speaker of the US House of Representatives Mike Johnson

Mike Johnson has his old job back, for now

But the GOP has the tightest House majority in nearly a century


When treating snakebites, American hospitals turn to zoos 

The zookeeper will see you now

Los Angeles against the flames

Always vulnerable, the city is increasingly susceptible to fire

The US Army needs less good, cheaper drones to compete

It seems obvious. So what is stopping it from happening?