Why winning a Wisconsin Supreme Court race matters so much
In a gridlocked, gerrymandered state, it is the Democrats’ best hope for change
ELECTING JUDGES is fundamentally odd. The perfect example of this is the race to fill an open seat for the Wisconsin Supreme Court. The two candidates met for the only debate of the campaign on March 21st. Daniel Kelly, the relative conservative, insisted in his closing remarks that he was completely apolitical. “We must not talk about politics,” he said. The moderator, a political journalist who had asked mostly political questions, thanked the debate’s sponsor, a website called WisPolitics.com. Journalists then flocked to Mr Kelly’s press adviser, a Republican Party activist and former candidate for lieutenant-governor, to try to get interviews.
This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline “Full-court press”
United States April 1st 2023
- Both America’s political camps agree that TikTok is troubling
- Perils grow as America and Russia stop sharing data on nukes
- School-voucher schemes are spreading across America
- Chicago tries to export its most unpleasant drink
- Why winning a Wisconsin Supreme Court race matters so much
- How to write the perfect 2024 campaign book
More from United States
America’s bet on industrial policy starts to pay off for semiconductors
Trump will not reverse the chip subsidies, but will he reinforce them?
Most Americans think moderate drinking is fine
They are unaware of the cancer risk
Mike Johnson has his old job back, for now
But the GOP has the tightest House majority in nearly a century
When treating snakebites, American hospitals turn to zoos
The zookeeper will see you now
Los Angeles against the flames
Always vulnerable, the city is increasingly susceptible to fire
The US Army needs less good, cheaper drones to compete
It seems obvious. So what is stopping it from happening?