United States | Relief pitch

The Supreme Court looks askance at Biden’s student-debt relief 

The conservative majority is sceptical of the $400bn-plus programme—but there’s a hitch

Activists and students protest in front of the Supreme Court during a rally for student debt cancellation in Washington, DC, on February 28, 2023. - The court begins oral arguments in two cases, one from six Republican-led states, that challenge US President Joe Biden's student debt forgiveness policy. (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS / AFP) (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images)
The justices may disagreeImage: Getty Images
|New York

INACTION in Congress has led recent presidents to resort to creative work-arounds. When he failed to get immigration reform through Congress, Barack Obama issued executive orders to shield some immigrants from deportation. Donald Trump declared a national emergency to divert funds to build his border wall. And Joe Biden has cited covid-19 as justification for barring evictions, requiring vaccinations and, last August, forgiving up to $20,000 in debt for student borrowers.

This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline “Relief pitch”

From the March 4th 2023 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from United States

Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo speaks at a convention in San Fransico

America’s bet on industrial policy starts to pay off for semiconductors

Trump will not reverse the chip subsidies, but will he reinforce them?

A red siren with a beer bottle in the centre

Most Americans think moderate drinking is fine

They are unaware of the cancer risk


Speaker of the US House of Representatives Mike Johnson

Mike Johnson has his old job back, for now

But the GOP has the tightest House majority in nearly a century


When treating snakebites, American hospitals turn to zoos 

The zookeeper will see you now

Los Angeles against the flames

Always vulnerable, the city is increasingly susceptible to fire

The US Army needs less good, cheaper drones to compete

It seems obvious. So what is stopping it from happening?