United States | Electoral administration

Reforming the Electoral Count Act would help prevent another riot

Who counts wins

|New York

FOR MUCH of the past year, Democrats in Congress have fitfully and unsuccessfully pushed various bits of voting-rights legislation. Whatever the merits of these bills, they are an odd first response to the insurrection of January 6th 2021. Record numbers of Americans voted in 2020. Long queues and pandemic-driven confusion notwithstanding, the problem was not access to the ballot, it was the attempted chicanery with the counting. The Electoral Count Act of 1887 (ECA), which tries to set guidelines for how Congress settles disputed results in presidential elections, is vague, confusing, possibly unconstitutional—and ripe for reform.

This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline “Who counts wins”

Mr Putin will see you now

From the January 8th 2022 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from United States

William McKinley.

Checks and Balance newsletter: Trump revives McKinley’s imperial legacy

Incoming "border czar" and former acting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement director Tom Homan speaks during a visit to Camp Eagle, Eagle Pass, Texas, USA.

Tom Homan, unleashed

America’s new border czar spent decades waiting for a president like Donald Trump


Voters in North Carolina

An unfinished election may shape a swing state’s future

A Supreme Court race ended very close. Then the lawyers arrived.


Donald Trump cries “invasion” to justify an immigration crackdown

His executive orders range from benign to belligerent

To end birthright citizenship, Donald Trump misreads the constitution

A change would also create huge practical problems

Ross Ulbricht, pardoned by Donald Trump, was a pioneer of crypto-crime

His dark website, the Silk Road, was to crime what Napster was to music