Are gunshot-detecting microphones worth the money?
Their impact on crime is far from clear
WALK AROUND one of the poorer neighbourhoods of Chicago and look at the street-lamps. You will see that many of them have protuberances sticking several feet above the light. These are microphones operated by ShotSpotter, a firm with its headquarters in California. They are spread over a large part of Chicago, and they capture the sounds of gunshots. Algorithms pick out the sounds, which are then verified by humans listening in from a control centre in Washington, DC. Triangulating the sounds from several microphones reveals where the guns were fired. Police are alerted and rush to the scene, quicker than if they had to wait for a 911 call—especially one that may not come.
This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline “Shot spotty”
United States December 4th 2021
- The buried boon to the wealthy in the Democrats’ tax plan
- Fixing the lead-pipe problem in Benton Harbor, and across America
- Are gunshot-detecting microphones worth the money?
- The Supreme Court seems ready to scrap the constitutional right to abortion
- America wants a stronger navy to face China. Can it build one?
- As Americans get back into their cars, road-rage shootings are spiking
- A racial-history lesson from the son of a slave
More from United States
A controversial idea to hand even more power to the president
Impoundment is about to come a step closer
Tom Homan, unleashed
America’s new border czar spent decades waiting for a president like Donald Trump
An unfinished election may shape a swing state’s future
A Supreme Court race ended very close. Then the lawyers arrived.
Donald Trump cries “invasion” to justify an immigration crackdown
His executive orders range from benign to belligerent
To end birthright citizenship, Donald Trump misreads the constitution
A change would also create huge practical problems