Civil rights v civil liberties at the ACLU
After decades of undue pessimism, civil libertarians should be moderately concerned
IN THE SUMMER of 1964 a television repairman and Klansman called Clarence Brandenburg invited a television reporter to join him at a hooded rally in rural Ohio. The resultant footage of Brandenburg and other goons standing by a burning cross and vowing to take “revengeance” against blacks and Jews landed him in jail for inciting violence. He was sprung by the Supreme Court, after it ruled that such a threat was too vague to abrogate his right to free speech. That precedent—the court’s last word on inflammatory language—was the nub of Donald Trump’s defence this week.
This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline “Speak easy”
United States February 13th 2021
- What are the prospects for bipartisanship?
- Facebook tries to pre-empt regulation by squeezing anti-vaxxers
- Why is New York so bad at running elections?
- America’s strange presidential museums
- Oregon decriminalises drugs for personal use
- Can America’s government deal with China’s after accusing it of genocide?
- Civil rights v civil liberties at the ACLU
More from United States
An alternative theory to explain America’s murder spike in 2020
What if it wasn’t about policing?
Donald Trump’s defining decade
Will America’s president overcome the 1970s, or just refight its battles?
Donald Trump revives ideas of a Star Wars-like missile shield
He wants a swarm of missile-toting satellites to take out incoming threats
America’s foreign aid pause puts lives at risk
Donald Trump sought disruption. He hurt America first.
Donald Trump goes to war with his employees
The president wants to shrink and remake the civil service