Why paying women to have more babies won’t work
Economies must adapt to baby busts instead
As birth rates plunge, many politicians want to pour money into policies that might lead women to have more babies. Donald Trump has vowed to dish out bonuses if he returns to the White House. In France, where the state already spends 3.5-4% of gdp on family policies each year, Emmanuel Macron wants to “demographically rearm” his country. South Korea is contemplating handouts worth a staggering $70,000 for each baby. Yet all these attempts are likely to fail, because they are built on a misapprehension.
This article appeared in the Leaders section of the print edition under the headline “Cash for kids ”
Leaders May 25th 2024
- Why paying women to have more babies won’t work
- Rishi Sunak’s election call makes no sense, but is good news
- The war-crimes case against the leaders of Israel and Hamas is flawed
- Hacking phones is too easy. Time to make it harder
- How to save South Africa
- What India’s clout in white-collar work means for the world
From the May 25th 2024 edition
Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents
Explore the editionMore from Leaders
The real meaning of the DeepSeek drama
The Chinese model-maker has panicked investors. But it is good for the users of AI
Rwanda does a Putin in Congo
To understand the seizure of Goma, consider a parallel with Ukraine
Sir Keir Starmer should aim higher in his reset with the EU
And he needs to be clearer about what Britain wants
To make electricity cheaper and greener, connect the world’s grids
Less than 3% of the world’s power is internationally traded—a huge wasted opportunity
Chinese AI is catching up, posing a dilemma for Donald Trump
The success of DeepSeek and other Chinese modelmakers threatens America’s lead
America has an imperial presidency
And in Donald Trump, an imperialist president for the first time in over a century