Why America’s banks need more capital
Though imperfect, regulators’ plans are necessary to keep the system safe
AMERICA SPENT more than a decade trying to make its banks safer, only for several of them to collapse suddenly earlier this year. So it is no surprise that regulators are trying once again to shore up the system. Their latest proposals would on average increase by 16% the amount of high-quality equity capital banks would need to fund their operations, among a litany of other changes designed to bring America’s rules in line with principles agreed globally. If the package—dubbed the “Basel 3 endgame”—is implemented, banks, which have been reporting their profits over the past week, will have to spend years building up their safety buffers.
Explore more
This article appeared in the Leaders section of the print edition under the headline “A brush with Basel”
More from Leaders
Despite fears of a global tax war, Donald Trump has a chance to make peace
A global minimum tax on companies ought to be acceptable to America
How to use “maximum pressure” to stop an Iranian bomb
The Islamic Republic is closer than ever to obtaining nukes
Milei, Modi, Trump: an anti-red-tape revolution is under way
Done right, deregulation could kick-start economic growth
By cutting off assistance to foreigners, America hurts itself
Donald Trump’s chaotic aid freeze makes his country weaker
The real meaning of the DeepSeek drama
The Chinese model-maker has panicked investors. But it is good for the users of AI
Rwanda does a Putin in Congo
To understand the seizure of Goma, consider a parallel with Ukraine