Have economists led the world’s environmental policies astray?
A new book argues for a supercharged approach to net zero
IF THE WORLD economy fails to decarbonise, it will not be because of the cost. The gross investment needed to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050 can seem enormous: a cumulative $275trn, according to the McKinsey Global Institute, a think-tank attached to the consultancy. But over a period of decades the world would have had to replace its cars, gas boilers and power plants anyway. So the additional spending needed to go green is in fact much smaller: $25trn. Spread that over many years and compare it to global GDP, and it looks significant but manageable, peaking at 1.4% between 2026 and 2035. And that is without counting the returns on the investment. British officials reckon that three-quarters of the total cost of the transition to net zero will be offset by benefits such as more efficient transport, and that the state may need to spend only 0.4% of GDP a year over three decades.
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “An EPIC challenge”
Finance & economics March 26th 2022
- The transition to clean energy will mint new commodity superpowers
- Three big uncertainties cloud the oil market
- Why foreign investors are feeling jittery about China
- The parallels between the nickel-trading fiasco and the LIBOR scandal
- Millennial demand helps stoke the housing boom
- Have economists led the world’s environmental policies astray?
More from Finance & economics
Europe could be torn apart by new divisions
The continent is at its most vulnerable in decades
How corporate bonds fell out of fashion
The market is at its hottest in years—and a shadow of its former self
An American purchase of Greenland could be the deal of the century
The economics of buying new territory
China’s markets take a fresh beating
Authorities have responded by bossing around investors
Can America’s economy cope with mass deportations?
Production slowdowns, more imports and pricier housing could follow
Would an artificial-intelligence bubble be so bad?
A new book by Byrne Hobart and Tobias Huber argues there are advantages to financial mania