How to avoid a fatal backlash against globalisation
Studying how the first era ended could help preserve the second
IN 1920 JOHN MAYNARD KEYNES reflected on the Britain he knew before the outbreak of the first world war. “The inhabitant of London”, he wrote, “could order by telephone, sipping his morning tea in bed, the various products of the whole earth.” Keynes’s Londoner “regarded this state of affairs as normal, certain and permanent”, and not long ago the globalisation of the present age seemed a similarly inexorable force. A new world war remains unlikely, but the uncomfortable echoes of the past in recent history suggest that a closer look at the rise and retreat of 19th-century globalisation might yield valuable lessons.
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “Second-time lucky”
Finance & economics February 26th 2022
- The economic consequences of the war in Ukraine
- America’s tariff wall on Chinese imports looks increasingly like Swiss cheese
- Despite bulging debt everywhere, the IMF is struggling to be helpful
- Gold demand has surged in India
- The battle to modernise Italy's corporate governance
- With maverick policies, Turkey cannot hope to bring down prices
- The many virtues of the yen, the rich world’s cheapest currency
- How to avoid a fatal backlash against globalisation
More from Finance & economics
The Los Angeles fires will be extraordinarily expensive
They will also expose California’s faulty insurance market
Europe could be torn apart by new divisions
The continent is at its most vulnerable in decades
How corporate bonds fell out of fashion
The market is at its hottest in years—and a shadow of its former self
An American purchase of Greenland could be the deal of the century
The economics of buying new territory
China’s markets take a fresh beating
Authorities have responded by bossing around investors
Can America’s economy cope with mass deportations?
Production slowdowns, more imports and pricier housing could follow