The IMF bashes the IMF over Argentina
The fund’s huge rescue plan for the country could not withstand the foreseeable risks it faced
INFLATION IN ARGENTINA had intensified, the IMF lamented. The cost of living had increased by some 50% over the course of the year. “The most important source of inflation”, the fund explained, “was government-deficit spending, financed by borrowing from the central bank.” The deficit, in turn, reflected excessive wage demands and the failure of the country’s utilities to raise prices in line with costs. The year was 1958. At the end of it, Argentina turned to the fund for its first “standby arrangement”, a line of credit accompanied by a plan to stabilise the economy.
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “Blood on the dance floor”
Finance & economics January 8th 2022
- How long can the global housing boom last?
- The EU’s green-investing “taxonomy” could go global
- A war of words ends with the Democrats in charge of a key regulator
- Economists are agreeing with each other more
- Could China’s north-east be home to its next banking disaster?
- The rise of personalised stock indices
- Why gold has lost some of its investment allure
- The IMF bashes the IMF over Argentina
More from Finance & economics
Do tariffs raise inflation?
Usually. But the bigger problem is that they harm economic growth and innovation
European governments struggle to stop rich people from fleeing
Exit taxes are popular, and counter-productive
Saba Capital wages war on underperforming British investment trusts
How many will end up in Boaz Weinstein’s sights?
Has Japan truly escaped low inflation?
Its central bankers are increasingly hopeful
How American bankers dodged the MAGA carnage
The masters of the universe have escaped an anti-globalist revolt
China’s financial system is under brutal pressure
When will something break?