Why it matters when trades settle
There is a case for redundancy in the settlement process
THE PAEANS that followed the recent retirement of KKR founders Henry Kravis and George Roberts, formerly private equity’s barbarians-in-chief, are a reminder that the story of Wall Street is one of big deals, bold trades and the people behind them. Those further behind them, in the “back offices” of banks, brokers and buy-out firms, barely get a look in. Understandably so: their world is colourless compliance and “post-trade” processes, like clearing and settlement. They are the plumbers of finance, toiling behind the scenes to ensure that the pipework, well, works. Every so often, however, there’s a gurgling noise loud enough to unsettle even those cocksure colleagues out front.
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “When the pipes creak”
Finance & economics October 23rd 2021
- A triple shock slows China’s growth
- Time for orderly resolution for Evergrande is running out
- What to make of the new bitcoin-linked exchange-traded fund
- Jens Weidmann steps down from the Bundesbank
- The race to redefine cross-border finance
- Why it matters when trades settle
- How soaring energy costs could hobble the covid-19 recovery
More from Finance & economics
Will America’s crypto frenzy end in disaster?
Donald Trump’s team is about to bring digital finance into the mainstream
Do tariffs raise inflation?
Usually. But the bigger problem is that they harm economic growth and innovation
European governments struggle to stop rich people from fleeing
Exit taxes are popular, and counter-productive
Saba Capital wages war on underperforming British investment trusts
How many will end up in Boaz Weinstein’s sights?
Has Japan truly escaped low inflation?
Its central bankers are increasingly hopeful
How American bankers dodged the MAGA carnage
The masters of the universe have escaped an anti-globalist revolt