China | Three steps to heaven

Some Chinese want their country to move closer to communism

How can a wealthy China still claim to be in the “initial stage of socialism”, scholars wonder?

Socialist Realism - a propaganda poster in Shanghai 1981. (Photo by: Planet One Images/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)

In a poor, communist country, the phrase sounded like a truism. But in the early 1980s China’s admission that it was still only in the “initial stage of socialism” was an ideological bombshell. The use of those words meant the country had become “totally freed from the restrictions of orthodox socialist principles”, recalled Zhao Ziyang, who took over as Communist Party chief later that decade and championed the term. It allowed China to introduce capitalism (a stage Marx viewed as essential) and repudiate Maoist madness. Many Chinese were delighted by the weakening of ideology’s grip on decision-making. China’s dramatic economic growth owes much to the licence it gave.

This article appeared in the China section of the print edition under the headline “Three steps to heaven”

How to win the long war

From the July 2nd 2022 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from China

A traditional fortune teller waits for customers in his shop in Beijing, China

It’s a good time to be an astrologer in China

In the face of hardship, the country’s youth are embracing superstition

A container terminal in Qingdao, China

The early days of the Trump administration, as viewed from China

A good start, but it could get worse quickly


A man watches live coverage on a TV screen at his store of Chinese President Xi Jinping

How (un)popular is China’s Communist Party?

As the economy falters and the social compact frays, Xi Jinping wants to know


An outrage that even China’s supine media has called out

Anger is growing over a form of detention linked to torture and deaths

Why foreign law firms are leaving China

A number of them are in motion to vacate

An initiative so feared that China has stopped saying its name

“Made in China 2025” has been a success, but at what cost?