A battle royal is brewing over copyright and AI
Beware the Napster precedent
Consider two approaches in the music industry to artificial intelligence (AI). One is that of Giles Martin, son of Sir George Martin, producer of the Beatles. Last year, in order to remix the Fab Four’s 1966 album “Revolver”, he used AI to learn the sound of each band member’s instruments (eg, John Lennon’s guitar) from a mono master tape so that he could separate them and reverse engineer them into stereo. The result is glorious. The other approach is not bad either. It is the response of Nick Cave, a moody Australian singer-songwriter, when reviewing lyrics written in his style by ChatGPT, an AI tool developed by a startup called OpenAI. “This song sucks,” he wrote. “Writing a good song is not mimicry, or replication, or pastiche, it is the opposite. It is an act of self-murder that destroys all one has strived to produce in the past.”
Explore more
This article appeared in the Business section of the print edition under the headline “Napster, remixed ”
Business March 18th 2023
More from Business
Meet the ambitious wolf cubs of Wall Street
A duo of whippersnappers is taking on Goldman Sachs
What next for US Steel?
The faded industrial icon has few good options without a Nippon deal
Foxconn and other gadget-makers are expanding their empires
The world’s contract manufacturers are moving into new products and places
The signals of workplace submissiveness
Deference is all around you, unfortunately
America’s internet giants are being outplayed in the global south
From e-commerce to online banking, regional competitors are innovating rapidly
Will Mark Zuckerberg’s Trump gamble pay off?
He risks making enemies elsewhere