How Boris Johnson’s failure to tackle sleaze among MPs could prove costly
The lessons of the latest parliamentary debacle in Britain
SOME POLITICAL dramas flare up briefly; others redraw the political landscape. The debacle in the House of Commons on November 3rd and 4th, when Boris Johnson tried to tear up the system of parliamentary oversight to prevent the suspension of Owen Paterson, a friend and MP, only to reverse course, looks like the second type. As furious Conservative MPs complained about being treated as cannon fodder, it strained their faith in the prime minister’s judgment and undermined the whips’ authority. It also gave fresh juice to other inquiries into Tory conduct, including Mr Johnson’s recent holiday at a Spanish villa, payment for seats in the House of Lords and the extra-parliamentary legal career of Sir Geoffrey Cox, a former attorney-general who earned £900,000 ($1.2m) in the past year. A YouGov poll after the fateful vote on November 3rd found that a Tory lead of 6% had narrowed to 1%.
This article appeared in the Britain section of the print edition under the headline “Learning from Paterson”
Britain November 13th 2021
- Can smaller reactors make nuclear power economic?
- Britons want to prevent climate change, but favour expensive solutions
- The Northern Ireland protocol is under threat. Again
- London’s bridges are falling down
- Voters do not want MPs to profit from their job
- Which products are scarce on Britain’s shelves?
- Britain used to treat her dead soldiers with disdain. One man changed that
- How Boris Johnson’s failure to tackle sleaze among MPs could prove costly
More from Britain
Britain’s brokers are diversifying and becoming less British
London’s depleted stockmarket is forcing them to change
What a buzzy startup reveals about Britain’s biotech sector
Lots of clever scientists, not enough business nous
Britain’s government lacks a clear Europe policy
It should be more ambitious over getting closer to the EU
The Rachel Reeves theory of growth
The chancellor says it’s her number-one priority. We ask her what that means for Britain