Is Britain’s plan to send asylum-seekers to Rwanda salvageable?
Spoiler alert: almost certainly not
Britain’s Supreme Court is sometimes criticised for being too deferential to the government. The government might well disagree. In 2017 the court ruled that fees for employment tribunals impeded access to justice. In 2019 it said Boris Johnson’s suspension of Parliament during the Brexit saga was unlawful. And earlier this month it delivered a sucker punch to Rishi Sunak’s ailing government when it ruled against the Conservatives’ cherished policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda.
Explore more
This article appeared in the Britain section of the print edition under the headline “Courting trouble”
Britain November 25th 2023
- Britain’s chancellor offers tax cuts and fiscal trickery
- Jeremy Hunt wants to improve Britain’s public-sector productivity
- The government tries to unlock growth capital for British firms
- The world’s first pathway for individually designed drugs
- The National Health Service has a new drugs deal
- Is Britain’s plan to send asylum-seekers to Rwanda salvageable?
- Britain’s native farm animals can be rarer than giant pandas
- What kind of legacy does Rishi Sunak want to leave behind?
From the November 25th 2023 edition
Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents
Explore the editionMore from Britain
The rise of the Net-Zero Dad
Middle-aged men care less about the problem. But they love the solution
Backing Heathrow expansion suggests Labour is serious about growth
It is the surest sign yet that the government is up for the fight
What the rise of bubble tea says about British high streets
A sugar rush from foreign students
Why Britain has fallen behind on road safety
More than 1,600 people still die each year in road collisions
Britain’s brokers are diversifying and becoming less British
London’s depleted stockmarket is forcing them to change