Britain | Abortion rights and wrongs

Should Britain change its abortion laws?

Trying to do so may cause more harm than good

A woman contemplating the pills in her hand
Image: Hokyoung Kim

LIKE MANY laws governing controversial matters, the Abortion Act of 1967 was a compromise. To protect women in Britain from backstreet abortions, it allowed the termination of pregnancies in most cases until 28 weeks (this was later lowered to 24). In recognition of some people’s belief that abortion is murder, it did not repeal sections of an act from 1861 that criminalise abortion. It also required two doctors to authorise a termination: a medically unnecessary step that carried an aura of disapproval. For more than half a century, this arrangement has meant that abortion law has been considered broadly settled.

This article appeared in the Britain section of the print edition under the headline “Hard cases, bad laws”

From the June 24th 2023 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Britain

U.S. President-elect Donald Trump and Elon Musk.

Blighty newsletter: What Westminster gets wrong about Elon Musk

Illustration of Keir Starmer choosing between two shirts - one with red stripes and one with red dots. He looks confused.

The four worst words in British politics 

Saying “not a good look” is not a good look


Protesters holding placards demand urgent action on the city's rising rents.

Inflation in Britain looks irritatingly persistent

Worse, the risk has appeared just as growth is sputtering


Labour lacks good ideas for improving Britain’s schools

Making private ones a bit more expensive is not an inspiring start

Britons brace themselves for more floods

A warming planet is making a soggy island soggier 

Why meal-replacement drinks are shaking up the British lunch

They are being rebranded as aspirational as well as efficient