How activists and charities embed contested ideologies on campus
Compliance is enforced by anonymous reporting tools and benchmarking schemes
IN LATE 2020 administrators at Cambridge University tried to update its free-speech policy to say that faculty and students must be “respectful” of the views and identities of others, rather than merely “tolerating” them. Fearing a chilling effect on research and debate, several scholars succeeded in getting a secret vote on the change. Fully 87% of faculty rejected it.
This article appeared in the Britain section of the print edition under the headline “Snitches and witches”
Britain March 26th 2022
- Rishi Sunak wants to be known as a tax-cutting chancellor
- Machines are once again doing the car-washing in Britain
- Hong Kongers are boosting Britain’s church numbers
- Anti-infection measures kept British prisoners safe during the pandemic
- Britain’s next nuclear plant will be identical to one under construction
- How activists and charities embed contested ideologies on campus
- To appreciate the SNP’s dominance, look at what it has done to the Tories
More from Britain
Why have Britain’s bond yields jumped sharply?
Mostly, blame Donald Trump. But Labour’s policies haven’t helped
The phenomenon of sexual strangulation in Britain
A survey suggests the risky practice is more common than you might think
The decline in remote working hits Britain’s housing market
A return to the office means a return to town
Britons are keener than ever to bring back lost and rare species
Immigrants that everyone can get behind
A much-praised British scheme to help disabled workers is failing them
It lavishes spending on some, and unfairly deprives others
Rolls-Royce cars pushes the pedal on customisation
Be your own Bond villain