Donald Trump says immigrants are eating Springfield’s pets. What?
He repeated the bizarre—and false—claim in his presidential debate against Kamala Harris
WHEN DONALD TRUMP uttered the word “Springfield” 33 minutes into the American presidential debate on September 10th, David Muir, the co-moderator, was prepared. In that small Ohio town, Mr Trump declared, illegal immigrants are “eating the dogs, they’re eating the cats, they’re eating the pets of the people who live there”. Mr Muir promptly replied that, according to Springfield’s city manager, there were no credible reports of pet-eating. The former president’s claim must have struck many viewers as bizarre. But lots of Mr Trump’s fans were primed for it: the allegation had been circulating in right-wing circles on social media, boosted by Elon Musk, the owner of X. How did the town come to be at the centre of a right-wing conspiracy theory?
Explore more
Discover more
Is RFK junior right to say America allows more toxins than the EU?
He is, but things are slowly beginning to change
What would it cost to kill coal?
The price of shutting down coal power, and what would be gained
Should America ban fluoride in its drinking water?
The idea by Robert F. Kennedy junior—nominated by Donald Trump as health secretary—may have teeth
Why is Donald Trump keen to use “recess appointments”?
The president-elect is testing the loyalty of the Senate’s next majority leader
Will Donald Trump’s power be unchecked if Republicans win the House?
A “trifecta” of presidency, Senate and House of Representatives would provide a huge opportunity
Why The Economist endorses political candidates
Our independence is protected by our principles and structure