The Economist explains

Why America has so many banks

Their numerousness can cause confusion—and brings both benefits and risks

circa 1965: Customers wait in line in front two tellers inside a bank, 1960s. A woman holds her baby at the end of the line. (Photo by Lambert/Getty Images)

AMERICA HAS a dizzying number of banks. In recent weeks, that has proved to be a source of confusion. After Signature Bank, based in New York City, was seized by regulators on March 12th, four other banks with the same name had to clarify that they had no link with the failure. When First Republic Bank, a California-based lender, secured a $30bn cash infusion just weeks before its own collapse, some traders mistakenly sold shares in the similarly named Republic First Bancorp, based in Philadelphia, sending its stock price tumbling by 28%. It is little wonder that America’s lenders get mixed up. There are more than 4,100 commercial banks in the country, according to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), compared with 353 in Britain and 261 in Germany. Why does America have so many banks?

This article appeared in the The Economist explains section of the print edition under the headline “Why America has so many banks”

More from The Economist explains

Where does Santa come from?

How a miracle-working Greek bishop, Dutch folk figure and early New York icon became the ubiquitous symbol of Christmas

Who are the main rebel groups in Syria?

They were united against the country’s dictator. Now they have little in common


Is RFK junior right to say America allows more toxins than the EU?

He is, but things are slowly beginning to change


What would it cost to kill coal?

The price of shutting down coal power, and what would be gained

Should America ban fluoride in its drinking water?

The idea by Robert F. Kennedy junior—nominated by Donald Trump as health secretary—may have teeth

Why is Donald Trump keen to use “recess appointments”?

The president-elect is testing the loyalty of the Senate’s next majority leader