Technology Quarterly | The names are meaningless

Node names do not reflect actual transistor sizes

A favourite way of measuring progress in the chip industry is detached from reality

Brightly coloured 3D rendered illustration of a series of transistors going down in size with labels next to them from XXL to XXXS but S to XXXS are all the same size
Illustration: Karan Singh

Pat gelsinger, boss of Intel, a chipmaker, loves to brag that his firm is leading the charge in semiconductor technology by entering the “angstrom era”. The angstrom, named in honour of Anders Jonas Ångström, a 19th-century Swedish physicist, is a somewhat archaic unit equal to a tenth of a nanometre (0.1nm, or a ten billionth of a metre). The “process nodes” of Intel’s latest chips are referred to as “20a” and “18a”. If you take those suffixed As as denoting “angstrom”—which Intel never flat out says that they do—that suggests dimensions of just 2nm or so. And at one point, process node was pretty much synonymous with transistor gate length.

This article appeared in the Technology Quarterly section of the print edition under the headline “A node by any other name...”

From the September 21st 2024 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition